Skip to content

Elementary Mathematics 2020 (I)

Set A

Questions 41–60 of 100

41Arithmetic • Number System • Divisibility
HardIdeal time: about 3 min

The number of three digit numbers (all digits are different) which are divisible by and also divisible by on reversing the order of the digits, is

Options
Show answer & solution

Option C

Four

Approach

Subtract the number from its reversal: the difference is , which forces to be a multiple of , leaving only a handful of digit pairs to test.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    , reversed

    Why: Working with the digits as letters is the only way to say anything about both the number and its reversal at once.

  2. 2

    Why: If divides and it divides their difference, and the term cancels — so the middle digit drops out of this condition entirely.

  3. 3
    , so must divide

    Why: is prime and does not divide , so the factor of has to sit in .

  4. 4
    (digits all different), so :

    Why: Digits run to and , so a difference of is impossible; this is the whole list.

  5. 5
    , so must divide

    Why: Now impose divisibility on itself. Reducing each place value (, ) turns the test into one small sum.

  6. 6
    ; ; ; ;

    Why: One linear expression in per pair; run from to and keep the multiples of .

  7. 7
    for ; for and ; for and

    Why: at ; at ; at ; at ; at .

  8. 8
    and have repeated digits; survive, so the count is

    Why: The condition 'all digits are different' is what kills the two numbers coming from , and it is the easiest condition in the question to forget.

Shortcut

Multiples of whose reversal is also a multiple of need , i.e. ; among distinct digits that is only and , and each pair admits exactly one middle digit, giving .

Common mistakes

Option A

Kept both and — each is a multiple of whose reversal is too — forgetting that all three digits must differ.

Option B

Kept one of or , overlooking its repeated digit.

Option D

Found , and one reversal, then stopped — the second reversal was never written down.

Skills used

42Algebra • Equations • Linear Equations
HardIdeal time: about 2.5 min

How many integral values of and satisfy the equation , where and ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option B

Approach

Pin down which can work by making a multiple of , write the whole family in one parameter, then count the parameter values both bounds allow.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    , so must divide

    Why: is an integer only when the right-hand side is a multiple of ; this converts the two-variable problem into one condition on .

  2. 2
    gives , so is one solution

    Why: Testing finds the first fit quickly; one solution is all that is needed to generate the rest.

  3. 3
    for every integer

    Why: Moving by changes by , which absorbs by moving by the other way; and share no factor, so no smaller step works and nothing is missed.

  4. 4

    Why: gives , and gives since .

  5. 5

    Why: The -bound is the looser of the two, so it removes nothing; checking it is still necessary before counting.

  6. 6
    , a count of

    Why: Both endpoints are included, so the count is the difference plus one — the step this question is built to catch.

Shortcut

must leave remainder on division by , so runs over : an arithmetic run of common difference from to , which has terms.

Common mistakes

Option A

Counted , forgetting that both endpoints are themselves solutions.

Option C

Allowed , which gives — the bound is strict.

Option D

No plausible route reaches 'None of the above'; is on the list.

Skills used

43Arithmetic • Number System • Divisibility
ModerateIdeal time: about 1.5 min

Let be a -digit number. Let . Which of the following statements is/are correct?

1
is always divisible by and
2
is always divisible by
3
is always divisible by

Select the correct answer using the code given below:

Options
Show answer & solution

Option D

1 and 3

Approach

Expand all three cyclic numerals by place value; every digit ends up with the same coefficient, so , and the three claims are read off from .

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1

    Why: The three numerals are the same digits cycled, so each digit occupies each place exactly once.

  2. 2

    Why: Adding the three expansions gives each digit the coefficient — this one line settles the whole question.

  3. 3

    Why: is not prime, and the factor is the part a candidate is most likely to miss.

  4. 4
    Statement 1 holds: is divisible by and by

    Why: Both divisors appear explicitly as factors, whatever the digits are.

  5. 5
    Statement 2 fails: gives , and

    Why: carries only one factor of , so divides only when is itself a multiple of — not something the question guarantees.

  6. 6
    Statement 3 holds: is a factor of , hence of

    Why: Same reason as statement 1; the factor is there for every choice of digits.

Shortcut

and : statements 1 and 3 are immediate, and statement 2 needs a second factor of that nothing supplies.

Common mistakes

Option A

Reached but left unfactorised, so the factor was never seen.

Option B

No route makes statement 2 the only correct one; statement 1 is visible the moment is written as .

Option C

Assumed supplies the second factor of needed for ; , where , shows it need not.

Skills used

44Arithmetic • Time, Speed and Distance
EasyIdeal time: about 55 s

In covering certain distance, the average speeds of and are in the ratio . If takes minutes more than to reach the destination, then what is the time taken by to reach the destination?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option C

minutes

Approach

Over the same distance time runs inversely to speed, so the times are in the ratio ; the minutes is the single part by which they differ.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    Speeds times

    Why: The distance is the same for both, so whoever is slower takes proportionally longer — the ratio simply turns over.

  2. 2
    Times and minutes

    Why: A ratio fixes the two times only up to a common factor; naming it lets the one given difference pin it down.

  3. 3

    Why: takes minutes more, and in these units the gap is exactly one part.

  4. 4
    's time minutes

    Why: The question asks for , the faster of the two, so it is the -part time, not the -part one.

Shortcut

Times are in the ratio , the difference is part min, so takes min.

Common mistakes

Option A

No plausible route reaches minutes.

Option B

No plausible route reaches minutes.

Option D

Gave 's time, minutes, instead of 's.

Skills used

45Statistics • Mean
EasyIdeal time: about 50 s

For two observations, the sum is and product is . What is the harmonic mean of these two observations?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option C

Approach

Write the harmonic mean of two numbers from its definition — the reciprocal of the average of the reciprocals — and the sum and product appear on their own.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    Let the observations be and , so and

    Why: Naming them lets the definition be written out; and are the only combinations that will survive.

  2. 2

    Why: The harmonic mean of values is divided by the sum of the reciprocals; for two values that is over two reciprocals.

  3. 3

    Why: Combining the reciprocals over a common denominator produces exactly the sum over the product.

  4. 4

    Why: Dividing by a fraction multiplies by its reciprocal, and the stays on top.

Shortcut

For two numbers the harmonic mean is , which is on sight.

Common mistakes

Option A

Turned the formula upside down, writing in place of .

Option B

Averaged the reciprocals and stopped: is the mean of the reciprocals, not its reciprocal.

Option D

Divided by instead of multiplying by .

Skills used

46Arithmetic • Percentage
EasyIdeal time: about 50 s

If the annual income of is more than that of , then the income of is less than that of by . What is the value of ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option B

Approach

Give a convenient income of , compute , then measure the shortfall as a percentage of — because 'less than ' makes the base.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1

    Why: is more than , so the increase is measured on ; choosing makes that arithmetic trivial.

  2. 2
    Shortfall

    Why: The absolute gap is the same whichever direction it is read; only the base changes.

  3. 3

    Why: ' is less than by ' measures the gap against , which is , not against .

  4. 4

    Why: and .

Shortcut

A rise of one way is a fall of the other: .

Common mistakes

Option A

No plausible route reaches .

Option C

No plausible route reaches ; it is placed next to the key to catch a guess.

Option D

Assumed the percentage reads the same both ways and reused the given ; but the base shifts from to .

Skills used

47Arithmetic • Number System • LCM and HCF
ModerateIdeal time: about 1.5 min

What is the least perfect square which is divisible by , , , and ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option C

Approach

Any common multiple of is a multiple of their LCM; make that LCM a square by topping up the primes whose exponents are odd.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1

    Why: Prime factorisations are what the LCM and the square condition are both read off.

  2. 2

    Why: Take each prime to the highest power appearing; is the smallest number divisible by all five.

  3. 3
    A perfect square has every prime exponent even; in the odd ones are

    Why: The required number must be a multiple of , so it carries at least these primes; squaring demands one more of each of the three that appear singly.

  4. 4

    Why: Multiplying by exactly is the least top-up: anything smaller leaves some exponent odd.

  5. 5

    Why: Confirms it is a square and shows the answer in the compact form .

Shortcut

The number must be : every prime in has to appear to an even power, and each need to appear at least once.

Common mistakes

Option A

is the least square divisible by — the was dropped from the LCM.

Option B

Multiplied by to 'balance' it, but still has odd exponents and is not a square.

Option D

Squared the LCM, ; that works but is four times larger than needed, because the in was already even.

Skills used

48Arithmetic • Time and Work • Pipes and Cisterns
EasyIdeal time: about 40 s

In a water tank there are two outlets. It takes minutes to empty the tank if both the outlets are opened. If the first outlet is opened, the tank is emptied in minutes. What is the time taken to empty the tank by second outlet?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option D

minutes

Approach

Outlets add their rates, not their times: subtract the first outlet's rate from the combined rate to get the second's.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    Total work units (the LCM of and )

    Why: Choosing the LCM as the tankful keeps every rate a whole number and avoids fractions entirely.

  2. 2
    Both together: units/min; first alone: units/min

    Why: Rate is work divided by time, and rates of outlets working at the same moment add.

  3. 3
    Second outlet unit/min

    Why: The combined rate is the sum of the two, so the unknown rate is the difference.

  4. 4
    Time minutes

    Why: Back from rate to time by dividing the tankful by the rate.

Shortcut

, so minutes.

Common mistakes

Option A

Copied the first outlet's time, minutes.

Option B

No plausible route reaches minutes.

Option C

Added the two given times, , instead of subtracting rates.

Skills used

49Algebra • Polynomial • Factor and Remainder Theorem
ModerateIdeal time: about 1.5 min

If is a factor of , then which one of the following is correct?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option D

Approach

, so both and are roots; add and subtract the two resulting equations.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1

    Why: A quadratic factor splits into two linear ones, which is what lets the factor theorem be used twice.

  2. 2

    Why: If is a factor then ; substituting just adds the coefficients.

  3. 3

    Why: , , , : the odd-power coefficients change sign, the even ones do not.

  4. 4
    Adding: ; subtracting:

    Why: The two equations have the same terms with reversed signs on and , so adding isolates the even part and subtracting the odd part.

  5. 5
    and , hence

    Why: Both sides are zero, so the stated equality holds — and it is the only one of the four that follows without extra assumptions.

Shortcut

means the even-power coefficients sum to zero and the odd-power ones sum to zero: .

Common mistakes

Option A

From , ; the minus sign was dropped on the way across.

Option B

Alternated the signs in starting from the wrong end, giving .

Option C

Took as in , giving and hence .

Skills used

50Algebra • Expressions • Algebraic Identities
ModerateIdeal time: about 1.5 min

If , what is the value of ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option C

Approach

Treat and walk down the ladder with , then climb to with the cube identity.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    Put , so the given is and the target is

    Why: Every exponent in the question is even, so working in removes the clutter and halves the ladder.

  2. 2

    Why: , so the square of the smaller expression is . The negative root is rejected because for real .

  3. 3

    Why: The same identity one rung down: , and again only the positive root can occur.

  4. 4

    Why: with gives — the correction term is what the wrong options drop.

Shortcut

and , so ; then .

Common mistakes

Option A

Added the correction term instead of subtracting it: .

Option B

Cubed and stopped at , forgetting the term.

Option D

Squared in place of cubing, as if came from .

Skills used

51Trigonometry • Trigonometric Identity • Degree and Radian
EasyIdeal time: about 45 s

A wheel makes revolutions in one minute. What is the number of radians it turns in one second?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option C

Approach

Convert revolutions per minute to revolutions per second, then one revolution to radians.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    revolutions per second

    Why: One minute is seconds, so the rate per second is the rate per minute divided by .

  2. 2
    One revolution radians

    Why: radians , so a full turn is — a half-turn would be only .

  3. 3
    radians per second

    Why: Multiply the number of turns by the radian measure of one turn.

Shortcut

rev/min rev/s rad/s.

Common mistakes

Option A

No plausible route reaches .

Option B

Found revolutions per second but took one revolution as radians instead of .

Option D

No plausible route reaches .

Skills used

52Trigonometry • Trigonometric Identity • Maximum and Minimum Values
HardIdeal time: about 2 min

What is the least value of ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option B

Approach

Use the Pythagorean identities to split off a constant, leaving a term plus a multiple of its reciprocal, which has a known least value.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1

    Why: and ; rewriting this way pulls out the part that cannot vary.

  2. 2

    Why: The is fixed, so minimising the whole expression means minimising .

  3. 3
    With :

    Why: , so the two terms are a number and a multiple of its reciprocal; for with .

  4. 4
    Least value , attained when , i.e.

    Why: Equality in needs , i.e. , and is reachable, so the bound is actually achieved.

Shortcut

For positive the least value of is ; here .

Common mistakes

Option A

No plausible route reaches .

Option C

Read off the constant term, as if and could both be made zero; they are reciprocals, so they cannot.

Option D

Sign slip on the two s from the identities, giving as the constant part.

Skills used

53Trigonometry • Trigonometric Identity • Complementary Angles
HardIdeal time: about 2 min

Let and . If , then which one of the following is correct?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option A

Approach

, so the angles and are complementary; pair the factors from the two ends and each pair multiplies to .

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    , and the factors run

    Why: runs from to , so the largest angle is — every factor is a cotangent of an acute angle, so all are defined and positive.

  2. 2

    Why: This is why pairing from the two ends is the move: the th factor and the th sit on complementary angles.

  3. 3
    , so

    Why: Cotangent and tangent of the same angle are reciprocals, so each pair collapses to .

  4. 4
    gives such pairs plus the self-paired , where and

    Why: is odd, so one factor is left over; it happens to be the one at , whose cotangent is .

  5. 5

    Why: Every pair contributes and the middle factor is , so the whole product is .

Shortcut

Pair with : complementary angles make each pair , and the leftover is also , so .

Common mistakes

Option B

Expected a factor of , but stops at and never reaches .

Option C

Noticed the early factors are very large and concluded the product must exceed , without pairing them against the small factors at the other end.

Option D

Paired correctly but inverted one factor in each pair, reading every pair as less than .

Skills used

54Trigonometry • Trigonometric Equation
EasyIdeal time: about 55 s

If , where , then what is the value of ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option A

Approach

Turn the cotangent into a tangent of the complementary angle; the two tangents then force their angles to be equal, which pins .

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1

    Why: Putting both sides in terms of tangent is what makes the equation solvable without any extra machinery.

  2. 2

    Why: and , and tangent is strictly increasing on that range, so equal tangents mean equal angles.

  3. 3
    , so

    Why: The question asks about , which is exactly half of — no need to carry the awkward any further.

  4. 4

    Why: , and secant is its reciprocal.

Shortcut

means , so and : .

Common mistakes

Option B

Solved , i.e. , so was read as .

Option C

Solved instead of , giving and .

Option D

No plausible route reaches .

Skills used

55Trigonometry • Heights and Distances
EasyIdeal time: about 1 min

A tree of height m is broken by wind in such a way that its top touches the ground and makes an angle with the ground. What is the height from the ground to the point where tree is broken?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option C

m

Approach

The broken piece is the hypotenuse of a right triangle whose vertical leg is the standing stump; the two pieces together are m.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    Stump , broken piece

    Why: The tree snaps but nothing is lost, so the two pieces account for the whole m.

  2. 2
    The broken piece leans from the break point to the ground at , so it is the hypotenuse and is the side opposite the

    Why: The ground is horizontal and the stump vertical, so the triangle is right-angled at the foot of the stump.

  3. 3

    Why: Opposite over hypotenuse — and crucially the hypotenuse is the broken piece, not the original m.

  4. 4
    m

    Why: Cross-multiplying clears the fraction and leaves a one-line linear equation.

Shortcut

At the hypotenuse is twice the opposite side, so the broken piece is twice the stump: , m.

Common mistakes

Option A

Gave the length of the broken piece, m, rather than the height of the break.

Option B

Measured the against the full height, , giving and rounding to .

Option D

No plausible route reaches m.

Skills used

56Geometry • Triangle • Similarity
HardIdeal time: about 3 min

On a plane area there are two vertical towers separated by feet apart. The shorter tower is feet tall. A pole of length feet stands on the line joining the base of two towers so that the tip of the towers and tip of the pole are also on the same line. If the distance of the pole from the shorter tower is feet, then what is the height of the taller tower (approximately)?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option A

feet

Approach

Three collinear tips means one straight line of sight; measure heights above the pole's tip and use similar triangles on the two horizontal distances.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    Shorter tower ft and taller tower ft stand ft apart; the pole is ft tall and ft from the shorter tower

    Why: Write the configuration down before drawing: the three tips lie on one line, so two of the three right triangles under that line are similar.

  2. 2
    The pole cannot lie between the towers: a line through and falls to at the far tower, which is below ground

    Why: A straight line cannot drop from to and then climb to a height above , so the pole must sit beyond the shorter tower, ft out on the same straight line.

  3. 3
    Measuring from the pole's tip: the shorter tower rises ft over ft, the taller rises ft over ft

    Why: Taking the pole's tip as the eye-point makes the two triangles share the angle of elevation, so they are similar by AA.

  4. 4

    Why: Corresponding sides of similar triangles are proportional; keeps the arithmetic in small numbers.

  5. 5
    ft

    Why: The ft has to be added back because the ratio was measured from the pole's tip, not from the ground.

Shortcut

From the pole's tip the sight line climbs ft in ft; over ft it climbs , so the taller tower is ft.

Common mistakes

Option B

No plausible route reaches feet.

Option C

No plausible route reaches feet.

Option D

Put the pole between the towers, ft from the taller one, and solved to get .

Skills used

57Trigonometry • Heights and Distances
EasyIdeal time: about 55 s

The angles of elevation of the top of a tower from two points at distances and from the base and on the same straight line are and respectively. What is the height of the tower?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option B

Approach

Write the two tangents from the right triangles; since and are complementary, their product is and the height drops out as a geometric mean.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    and

    Why: Each point of observation, the base and the top form a right triangle with the tower as the opposite side.

  2. 2
    , so

    Why: Spotting that the two angles are complementary is what makes the unknown angles cancel; without it the question needs tables.

  3. 3

    Why: Multiplying the two equations removes both tangents at once.

  4. 4

    Why: A height is positive, so only the positive root is taken.

Shortcut

Elevations that add to from distances and always give .

Common mistakes

Option A

Reached and forgot to take the square root.

Option C

No plausible route reaches .

Option D

No plausible route reaches .

Skills used

58Trigonometry • Trigonometric Identity • Complementary Angles
ModerateIdeal time: about 1.5 min

What is the value of ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option D

Approach

List the angles, pair each with its complement so that the two squared sines add to , and handle the one term left over.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    The angles are : terms

    Why: Counting the terms first is what makes the pairing bookkeeping safe.

  2. 2

    Why: , so complementary angles make each pair collapse to .

  3. 3
    — pairs

    Why: Every multiple of from to pairs with another; is not a multiple of , so no term is its own partner.

  4. 4
    pairs use terms, leaving

    Why: is odd, so exactly one term is unpaired — and it is the last one, whose sine is .

  5. 5
    Sum

    Why: Seven pairs contribute each and the leftover contributes .

Shortcut

Fifteen terms, seven complementary pairs each worth , plus : total .

Common mistakes

Option A

Treated the series as collapsing entirely to its last term.

Option B

No plausible route reaches .

Option C

No plausible route reaches .

Skills used

59Trigonometry • Trigonometric Identity
EasyIdeal time: about 1 min

What is equal to?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option B

Approach

Rewrite as , put both terms over the common denominator , and use .

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1

    Why: Both terms must be in sine and cosine before they can be combined.

  2. 2

    Why: The common denominator is just the product of the two denominators; nothing cancels yet.

  3. 3
    Numerator

    Why: turns the numerator into a copy of the factor sitting in the denominator — that is the whole trick.

  4. 4

    Why: cancels (it is non-zero except at , where the expression is undefined anyway).

Common mistakes

Option A

Interchanged sine and cosine at the last step, so was written as .

Option C

Read as and the first fraction as , then added the two separately instead of combining them.

Option D

Rationalised the first fraction with sine and cosine interchanged, giving , and dropped the second term.

Skills used

60Trigonometry • Trigonometric Identity
ModerateIdeal time: about 1.5 min

What is equal to ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option A

Approach

Show the first fraction equals — the second term exactly — so the difference is zero.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    Multiply the first fraction above and below by

    Why: The denominator is one half of a difference of squares; supplying the other half is what clears it.

  2. 2
    Denominator

    Why: with and , then leaves only the cross term.

  3. 3
    Numerator

    Why: Grouping as is another difference of squares; .

  4. 4
    First fraction

    Why: cancels, leaving exactly the second term of the question.

  5. 5

    Why: The two expressions are identical, so the whole expression vanishes for every where it is defined.

Shortcut

The standard identity makes the subtraction immediate.

Common mistakes

Option B

Simplified the first fraction correctly but then divided by the second term instead of subtracting it.

Option C

No plausible route reaches .

Option D

No plausible route reaches .

Skills used