Skip to content

Elementary Mathematics 2019 (I)

Set A

Questions 41–60 of 100

41Algebra • Surds • Nested Radicals
EasyIdeal time: about 1 min

What is the value of ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option D

Approach

Name the infinite radical ; it reappears inside itself, which turns the nest into a quadratic.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    , so the value asked for is

    Why: The leading sits outside every radical sign, so set it aside and work only on the nest.

  2. 2

    Why: Everything under the first root is the whole nest over again, so the nest contains a copy of itself; squaring clears the outer root.

  3. 3

    Why: Split the middle term: and multiply to and add to .

  4. 4
    , rejecting ; hence

    Why: A radical sign denotes the non-negative root, so the nest cannot be negative. Now restore the that was set aside.

Shortcut

Set equal to the whole expression: then , so and is or ; fails , leaving .

Common mistakes

Option A

Took the whole expression as , reached , and kept the root instead of rejecting it for making negative.

Option B

Evaluated the nest correctly as but forgot the standing outside it.

Option C

No route reaches .

Skills used

42Algebra • Sets • Operations
EasyIdeal time: about 50 s

In an examination, candidates failed in English and failed in Mathematics. If failed in both the subjects, then what percent passed in both the subjects ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option D

Approach

Take the total as candidates, count how many failed in at least one subject by inclusion-exclusion, and take the complement.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    , , out of a total of

    Why: Percentages of one and the same total behave exactly like counts out of , so no unknown total has to be carried.

  2. 2

    Why: Adding the two failure figures counts the who failed both subjects twice, so one copy of them has to be removed.

  3. 3
    passed in both

    Why: Passing in both subjects is the same as failing in neither, which is the complement of the union.

Common mistakes

Option A

Stopped at the union: is the percentage who failed in at least one subject, not the percentage who passed in both.

Option B

Computed , the percentage who passed in Mathematics, ignoring English altogether.

Option C

Computed , the percentage who passed in English, ignoring Mathematics.

Skills used

43Arithmetic • Ratio and Proportion • Division into Parts
EasyIdeal time: about 1.5 min

A man who recently died left a sum of Rs. to be divided among his wife, five sons and four daughters. He directed that each son should receive times as much as each daughter receives and that each daughter should receive twice as much as their mother receives. What was the wife's share ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option C

Rs.

Approach

Measure every share in units of the wife's share, count how many units the estate is divided into, and divide.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    Let the wife's share be

    Why: Name the quantity the question actually asks for, so nothing has to be converted back at the end.

  2. 2
    each daughter , and each son

    Why: The two conditions chain: a daughter is pegged to the mother, and a son is pegged to a daughter — not to the mother.

  3. 3

    Why: There are five sons and four daughters, so each individual share is multiplied by the number of people drawing it.

  4. 4

    Why: The whole estate is distributed, so the units must account for all of Rs. .

Shortcut

Rs. split into equal units is Rs. a unit, and the wife takes exactly one unit.

Common mistakes

Option A

No route reaches Rs. : it does not divide a whole number of times.

Option B

No route reaches Rs. .

Option D

No route reaches Rs. .

Skills used

44Arithmetic • Interest • Compound Interest
ModerateIdeal time: about 1.5 min

What is the least number of complete years in which a sum of money put out at annual compound interest will be more than trebled ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option B

Approach

Each year multiplies the sum by ; find the smallest whole number of years for which that repeated factor passes .

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1

    Why: Compound interest multiplies the balance by the same factor every year, so years multiply it times.

  2. 2
    'more than trebled' means , i.e.

    Why: Trebling refers to the amount, not to the interest, and cancels — so the answer does not depend on the sum invested.

  3. 3
    , ,

    Why: Build the fourth power by squaring rather than multiplying by four times; it halves the arithmetic.

  4. 4
    , so the least number of complete years is

    Why: At the end of three years the sum is still short of three times the principal; the fourth year carries it past.

Common mistakes

Option A

Read as close enough to and called the sum trebled in three years.

Option C

Used simple interest, where gives , and then took the boundary value instead of the first whole year beyond it.

Option D

Used simple interest throughout: a year needs in interest to treble the sum, which takes more than years and so complete years.

Skills used

45Arithmetic • Interest • Simple Interest
ModerateIdeal time: about 1.5 min

A person divided a sum of Rs. into three parts and invested at , and per annum simple interest. At the end of two years, he got the same interest on each part of money. What is the money invested at ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option B

Rs.

Approach

Equal interest over equal time forces each part to be inversely proportional to its rate; turn that into a ratio and share out Rs. .

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1

    Why: Simple interest is , and the three interests are stated to be equal.

  2. 2

    Why: The common factor cancels, which is why the two years never enter the answer.

  3. 3

    Why: Equal products mean the parts go inversely with the rates; multiplying the three reciprocals by , the LCM of , and , clears the fractions.

  4. 4

    Why: The three parts together make up the whole sum.

  5. 5
    money at

    Why: The highest rate carries the smallest part — that is the whole point of the inverse ratio.

Common mistakes

Option A

No route reaches Rs. .

Option C

No route reaches Rs. .

Option D

No route reaches Rs. .

Skills used

46Algebra • Expressions • Algebraic Identities
EasyIdeal time: about 1 min

What is equal to ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option A

Approach

The three brackets add to zero, so the sum of their cubes collapses to three times their product — which is exactly the denominator.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    Put , ,

    Why: Naming the brackets exposes the only structure that matters; nothing about , and separately is ever needed.

  2. 2

    Why: Each of , and appears once with a plus and once with a minus, so the sum vanishes identically — for all , , , with no condition to check.

  3. 3
    , so

    Why: Killing the factor kills the whole right-hand side, whatever the second bracket happens to be.

  4. 4

    Why: Numerator and denominator are now literally the same expression.

Common mistakes

Option B

Argued that because the three brackets add to zero their cubes must add to zero as well.

Option C

Used , dropping the factor from the identity, so the fraction came out as .

Option D

Got the numerator right as but divided by , overlooking the already printed in the denominator.

Skills used

47Algebra • Logarithm • Equations
ModerateIdeal time: about 1.5 min

If and , then what is equal to ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option C

Approach

Call the common value , express , , as powers of , and feed them into .

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    Let

    Why: Three quantities are stated to be equal; naming that common value is what allows the three different bases to be compared at all.

  2. 2
    , ,

    Why: Raising to the power returns , because a power of a power multiplies the indices.

  3. 3

    Why: Every term now sits on the single base , so the given relation becomes a statement about indices alone.

  4. 4

    Why: Equal powers of one and the same base force the exponents to be equal.

Shortcut

Take logarithms of : , , , and becomes after dividing by .

Common mistakes

Option A

Used the given relation as rather than , which loses the factor and leaves .

Option B

Right magnitude, but a sign was flipped somewhere in moving the indices across.

Option D

Reached and then attached a minus sign, as though the reciprocals had been subtracted rather than added.

Skills used

48Algebra • Quadratic Equations • Roots
EasyIdeal time: about 1 min

If p and q are the roots of the equation and , then what is the value of r ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option B

Approach

Use the sum of the roots together with the given difference, through the identity linking difference, sum and product.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    and

    Why: For the sum of the roots is and their product is .

  2. 2

    Why: This identity ties the difference to the sum and the product, so the roots themselves never have to be found.

  3. 3

    Why: Substitute and and solve the one linear equation in .

Shortcut

with means the roots are and , so straight away.

Common mistakes

Option A

Correct method, but was mis-divided.

Option C

No route reaches .

Option D

No route reaches .

Skills used

49Algebra • Quadratic Equations • Quadratic Inequalities
EasyIdeal time: about 50 s

For the inequation , which one of the following is correct ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option D

or

Approach

Factorise the quadratic, then ask where a product of two linear factors is positive.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1

    Why: Split the middle term: and multiply to and add to .

  2. 2
    The roots are and , and the coefficient of is

    Why: An upward parabola is negative only strictly between its roots and positive everywhere outside them, so the sign pattern is fixed once the roots are known.

  3. 3
    or , i.e. or

    Why: Both factors are negative when and both positive when ; between and they have opposite signs and the product is negative.

Common mistakes

Option A

Solved instead — the interval between the roots is where the quadratic is negative, not positive.

Option B

Found both regions but reported only the left one, treating the two branches as alternatives rather than as one solution set.

Option C

Found both regions but reported only the right one.

Skills used

50Algebra • Expressions • Factorisation
ModerateIdeal time: about 1.5 min

The expression has a factor

Options
Show answer & solution

Option C

Approach

Rewrite both terms as -th powers of whole numbers, then show the two bases leave the same remainder on division by .

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1

    Why: A power of a power multiplies the indices, which puts both terms into the single shape with the same exponent.

  2. 2

    Why: For the difference of the bases is where a factor independent of can come from, so compute it first.

  3. 3
    and leave the same remainder on division by , so and leave the same remainder as each other, and is a multiple of for every

    Why: Replacing a base by another leaving the same remainder does not change the remainder of its powers; this is the remainder argument behind ' divides '.

  4. 4
    At the expression is , which neither nor divides

    Why: A factor has to work for every , so one counterexample disposes of an option — and the smallest is the cheapest place to look.

Shortcut

is a multiple of for every , so is a factor without any case work.

Common mistakes

Option A

Tested only , where is indeed divisible by , and did not check , where is not.

Option B

Tested only , where happens to be divisible by ; it fails at .

Option D

Checked and against the value at , found both failing, and concluded no listed number works without testing itself.

Skills used

51Trigonometry • Trigonometric Identity
EasyIdeal time: about 40 s

If , , then what is the value of ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option B

Approach

Identify the angle from , then substitute.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    with gives

    Why: is the only acute angle whose opposite and adjacent sides are equal, so the tangent equals there and nowhere else in the range.

  2. 2

    Why: Read both off the half-square triangle with sides , , .

  3. 3

    Why: Substitute both values; the factor is part of what is asked and must survive to the end.

Common mistakes

Option A

Computed and reported it, dropping the factor the question asks for.

Option C

Took (or ), for which .

Option D

No route reaches from .

Skills used

52Trigonometry • Trigonometric Identity • Complementary Angles
EasyIdeal time: about 40 s

What is the value of ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option C

Approach

Rewrite each ratio of as the co-ratio of , which turns the two products into two squares.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    , so and

    Why: The two angles are complementary; the expression is designed so that bringing everything to one angle makes it collapse.

  2. 2

    Why: Substituting both replacements turns each product into the square of a single ratio.

  3. 3

    Why: The Pythagorean identity holds for every angle, so no table of values is needed.

Common mistakes

Option A

Treated the expression as a single ratio of the difference instead of pairing complementary angles.

Option B

Assumed the two terms cancel, as they would if the second carried a minus sign.

Option D

Applied to each of the two products separately and added the two ones.

Skills used

53Trigonometry • Trigonometric Identity • Maximum and Minimum Values
HardIdeal time: about 2 min

Suppose , then for every , is greater than or equal to

Options
Show answer & solution

Option B

Approach

Move the candidate lower bound across and look for a perfect square, which is the only way to settle an inequality claimed for every .

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1

    Why: The expression and differ by a perfect square — recognise as with .

  2. 2
    for every , so

    Why: A square is never negative, and equality occurs only where , i.e. at — which is why the option says 'greater than or equal to'.

  3. 3
    As the expression tends to , which is below and below ; and as , grows without bound while the expression stays at

    Why: 'For every ' means a single counterexample kills a claim, and the two ends of the range are where to look.

Common mistakes

Option A

Tested a middling angle such as , where the expression is , and assumed the floor holds throughout; it fails as approaches , where the expression approaches .

Option C

Checked the claim near or above, where it does hold, without testing small , where approaches and the expression approaches .

Option D

Checked only small , where is small, and missed that the tangent is unbounded as approaches .

Skills used

54Trigonometry • Heights and Distances
HardIdeal time: about 2.5 min

Consider a regular hexagon ABCDEF. Two towers are situated at B and C. The angle of elevation from A to the top of the tower at B is , and the angle of elevation to the top of the tower at C is . What is the ratio of the height of towers at B and C?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option B

Approach

Get the two ground distances and in the regular hexagon, then each height is its own ground distance times the tangent of its angle of elevation.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    Let the hexagon have side ; and are adjacent vertices, so

    Why: The foot of the first tower is one side away from the observer, so its ground distance needs no work.

  2. 2
    Each interior angle of a regular hexagon is , so in we have and

    Why: and are two vertices apart, and the triangle joining them through is isosceles with the hexagon's own interior angle at .

  3. 3
    The base angles are each, and the perpendicular from bisects , so

    Why: Dropping the perpendicular from the apex of an isosceles triangle splits it into two right triangles, which is how the is turned into something a ratio can be taken of.

  4. 4

    Why: The tower is vertical and the elevation is taken from at ground level, so height ground distance .

  5. 5

    Why: The same right-triangle relation, but with the longer ground distance — using again here is the commonest error.

  6. 6

    Why: Divide; cancels, so the side of the hexagon never had to be known.

Shortcut

.

Common mistakes

Option A

Used the same ground distance for both towers, so the ratio came out as .

Option C

No route reaches .

Option D

Took as the long diagonal instead of the short diagonal , giving .

Skills used

55Trigonometry • Trigonometric Identity • Complementary Angles
EasyIdeal time: about 45 s

What is the value of ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option B

Approach

Pair each angle with its complement; each pair multiplies to , and count what is left over.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    , so

    Why: Complementary angles turn a tangent into a cotangent, and a ratio multiplied by its reciprocal is .

  2. 2
    The factors pair as — that is pairs using of them, leaving

    Why: The angles run from to , which is symmetric about ; counting the pairs is what makes sure nothing is left unaccounted for.

  3. 3
    Product

    Why: , so the one unpaired factor changes nothing.

Common mistakes

Option A

Read the product as starting from , which is and would wipe the whole product out.

Option C

No route reaches .

Option D

Judged the product to grow without bound because the later factors such as are very large, without noticing that each is paired with a very small one.

Skills used

56Trigonometry • Triangle
HardIdeal time: about 2.5 min

There are two parallel streets each directed North to South. A person in the first street travelling from South to North wishes to take the second street which is on his right side. At some place, he makes a turn to the right and he travels for minutes at the speed of . After that he takes a left turn of and travels for minutes at the speed of in order to meet the second street. What is the distance between the two streets?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option C

Approach

Both streets run north-south, so the gap between them is the total east-west displacement; resolve each leg and add its eastward part.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    First leg ; second leg

    Why: Convert each time to hours before multiplying, so both distances come out in kilometres.

  2. 2
    He faces north; turning to the right leaves him clockwise from north, which is east of due south

    Why: A turn is measured from the direction already being faced, and re-expressing the heading as an angle from the north-south line is what lets it be resolved.

  3. 3
    Turning to the left brings the heading to clockwise from north, i.e. due east

    Why: A left turn subtracts from the clockwise angle. This is the step the question turns on: the last leg runs exactly perpendicular to the two streets.

  4. 4
    Eastward part of the first leg

    Why: The heading was away from the north-south line, so the east-west offset is the leg times the sine of that angle.

  5. 5
    Distance between the streets

    Why: The second leg is due east, so all of it counts; the north-south parts of the journey are irrelevant because the streets run in that very direction.

Common mistakes

Option A

Swapped the two pairs of figures, taking for minutes as the leg that reaches the street and answering .

Option B

No route reaches .

Option D

Added the two distances travelled, , without resolving the first leg into its north-south and east-west parts.

Skills used

57Trigonometry • Trigonometric Equation
EasyIdeal time: about 45 s

If where , then what is the value of ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option A

Approach

Write the cotangent as a reciprocal so the equation involves one quantity only.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1

    Why: Cotangent is the reciprocal of tangent, so multiplying through by leaves a single unknown, .

  2. 2

    Why: On the tangent is non-negative, so the negative square root is discarded.

  3. 3
    , so

    Why: Read off the standard value, then convert to radians because the options are given in radians.

Common mistakes

Option B

Dropped the and solved , which gives and .

Option C

Inverted the reciprocal step and reached instead of , giving .

Option D

Took because , overlooking that is undefined there so the equation has no meaning.

Skills used

58Trigonometry • Trigonometric Identity • Complementary Angles
Very easyIdeal time: about 25 s

What is the value of ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option B

Approach

is the complement of , so the second term is really a cosine of the first angle.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1

    Why: Angles adding to let a sine be rewritten as the cosine of the other one, which brings both terms to a single angle.

  2. 2

    Why: The Pythagorean identity finishes it, with no table of values needed.

Common mistakes

Option A

Assumed the two terms cancel, as they would if the expression were a difference.

Option C

Applied to each term separately and added the two ones.

Option D

No route reaches .

Skills used

59Trigonometry • Trigonometric Identity
EasyIdeal time: about 1 min

What is the value of ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option A

Approach

Cube : the sixth powers and the term are exactly what that produces.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1

    Why: The sixth powers wanted are the cubes of and , so cube the one identity that already relates those two quantities.

  2. 2
    With and , gives

    Why: Use the grouped form of the cube, because here is known to be and the cross terms collapse at once.

  3. 3
    , so the expression is

    Why: The question subtracts precisely the that the identity delivers, so the whole thing vanishes for every .

Common mistakes

Option B

Computed correctly but forgot to subtract the printed at the end.

Option C

No route reaches .

Option D

No route reaches .

Skills used

60Trigonometry • Trigonometric Identity • Maximum and Minimum Values
ModerateIdeal time: about 1.5 min

Consider the following for real numbers , , and :

1
2
3
4

How many of the above statements are not possible?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option C

Three

Approach

Test each statement against the range of the ratio concerned: sine and cosine never exceed in size, so secant and cosecant are never below in size, while the tangent is unbounded.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    and , so ; is impossible

    Why: The reciprocal of a number no larger than in size is never smaller than in size.

  2. 2
    takes every real value, so is possible — it happens just below

    Why: The bound on sine and cosine does not carry over to the tangent; this is the statement the question is really testing.

  3. 3
    and , so ; is impossible

    Why: Exactly the same reciprocal argument as for the secant.

  4. 4
    , so is impossible

    Why: This one is outside the range of the cosine directly, with no reciprocal step.

  5. 5
    Statements , and are not possible: three of them

    Why: The question counts the impossible statements, not the possible ones.

Common mistakes

Option A

Spotted only as impossible and accepted the reciprocal ratios and as small, harmless numbers.

Option B

Caught two of the three, typically missing that and obey the same bound as each other.

Option D

Rejected as well, applying the sine and cosine bound to the tangent, which has no such bound.

Skills used