Skip to content

Elementary Mathematics 2018 (I)

Set A

Questions 1–20 of 100

1Arithmetic • Number System • Divisibility
EasyIdeal time: about 1 min

is divisible by

Options
Show answer & solution

Option D

Approach

Factor out the lowest power , then factorise the integer that is left.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1

    Why: Every term shares the factor , and taking it out reduces a sum of four huge powers to times a small integer.

  2. 2

    Why: The bracket is a short sum that can be added directly.

  3. 3
    , so the whole expression is

    Why: Prime-factorising lists every prime divisor; contributes only the prime , so the primes available are , , and .

  4. 4
    divides the expression; , and do not

    Why: Only appears among the prime powers, and fails because occurs to the first power only.

Shortcut

Only the bracket can supply a prime other than , so factorise and read the answer off.

Common mistakes

Option A

No route reaches : it divides neither nor any power of .

Option B

Saw that the digit sum of is , a multiple of , and applied the divisibility test for as though it settled .

Option C

Mis-added the bracket as .

Skills used

2Algebra • Expressions • Simplification
ModerateIdeal time: about 1.5 min

If , then what is the value of ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option C

Approach

Use to rewrite as , so the two fractions share one denominator.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1

    Why: The single given relation lets be removed from the expression entirely.

  2. 2

    Why: Because is the mean of and , the two numbers sit symmetrically about : whatever is above , is below it.

  3. 3

    Why: Substituting the previous line turns the second denominator into the first one, up to a sign.

  4. 4

    Why: One common denominator, and the numerator is exactly that denominator. Note is forced by the expression being defined at all.

Shortcut

Read as ' is halfway between and ', so and are negatives of each other and the sum collapses in one line.

Common mistakes

Option A

Combined the fractions correctly but flipped the sign of the numerator, reaching .

Option B

Assumed the two terms must cancel because the denominators are negatives of each other, ignoring the unequal numerators.

Option D

Solved the more familiar version , whose value is , having misread the second numerator as .

Skills used

3Algebra • Indices
EasyIdeal time: about 1 min

If , and where , , , then what is the value of ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option B

Approach

Substitute each relation into the next until is expressed as a power of itself.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1

    Why: Substituting and multiplying the indices brings onto the base .

  2. 2

    Why: Substituting closes the cycle and puts both sides on the base .

  3. 3
    with , so

    Why: For a positive base other than , equal powers force equal indices.

  4. 4

    Why: Invert the previous line.

Common mistakes

Option A

Inverted one substitution, reading rather than somewhere in the chain, and picked up a spurious sign on the index.

Option C

Wrote and concluded that the index itself must be rather than that .

Option D

Counted the three relations rather than deriving anything from them.

Skills used

4Algebra • Indices
ModerateIdeal time: about 1.5 min

If and , then what is equal to ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option C

Approach

Read as ' are in arithmetic progression' so the three indices reduce to one letter, then use .

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    , so and

    Why: A middle term equal to the mean of its neighbours is exactly the condition for three terms in arithmetic progression, so one common difference describes all three.

  2. 2

    Why: Each index in the expression is now a multiple of the single unknown .

  3. 3

    Why: Collecting the common index turns the product into a single power of , which is the quantity the second given controls.

  4. 4
    , so the value is

    Why: A negative index is a reciprocal, which is what lets become the denominator .

Shortcut

The two conditions say the indices are in AP and the bases are in GP; a GP raised to AP-spaced indices always telescopes to .

Common mistakes

Option A

Counted the three factors in the expression instead of evaluating it.

Option B

Used to write the product as rather than as , confusing the exponent with the value.

Option D

Lost a sign when writing and , reaching with an extra minus in front.

Skills used

5Arithmetic • Number System • Rational Numbers
EasyIdeal time: about 45 s

Which one of the following is correct ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option D

Decimal expansion of an irrational number is non-terminating and non-repeating.

Approach

Classify the decimal expansion of a rational number, then take irrational to be exactly the complement.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    A rational in lowest terms terminates exactly when ; otherwise it is non-terminating but recurring.

    Why: This is the full description of the rational case, and it shows at once that neither 'always terminating' nor 'always non-terminating' is true of rationals.

  2. 2
    terminates while does not, so options A and B each fail on the other's example.

    Why: One counterexample apiece is enough to reject both halves of the rational claim.

  3. 3
    Any terminating decimal equals , a rational, so an irrational number's expansion cannot terminate. Option C is false.

    Why: A terminating expansion is itself a proof of rationality, which an irrational number cannot have.

  4. 4
    A recurring expansion also converts to a fraction, so an irrational expansion can be neither terminating nor recurring: it is non-terminating and non-repeating.

    Why: Rationals occupy exactly the terminating and the recurring expansions, so the irrationals are precisely what is left.

Common mistakes

Option A

Remembered only the terminating rationals such as and forgot the recurring ones.

Option B

Remembered only the recurring rationals such as and forgot the terminating ones.

Option C

Swapped the two classes, attaching 'terminating' to irrational numbers instead of to some rational ones.

Skills used

6Algebra • Quadratic Equations • Roots
EasyIdeal time: about 45 s

If the roots of the equation are reciprocal to each other, then which one of the following is correct ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option B

Approach

Reciprocal roots means their product is ; read the product off Vieta.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    Let the roots be and .

    Why: 'Reciprocal to each other' is exactly the statement that one root is the reciprocal of the other.

  2. 2
    Product of roots

    Why: Whatever is (and it cannot be , since has no reciprocal), the product is .

  3. 3
    For , product of roots , so

    Why: Vieta's product relation is with and .

  4. 4
    , i.e.

    Why: Cross-multiplying, valid because for the equation to be a quadratic at all.

Shortcut

Reciprocal roots constant term equals leading coefficient.

Common mistakes

Option A

No route gives a factor of on the leading coefficient.

Option C

No route gives a factor of on the constant term.

Option D

Confused 'reciprocal roots' with 'equal roots' and reached for the discriminant condition , then misread it as .

Skills used

7Algebra • Equations • Linear Equations
ModerateIdeal time: about 1.5 min

If and , then what is equal to ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option A

Approach

The coefficient pair is near-symmetric, so add the two equations and subtract them rather than eliminating one variable at a time.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    The coefficient ratios differ, , so the pair has exactly one solution.

    Why: Confirms before any work that a unique , and hence a unique , exists.

  2. 2
    Adding:

    Why: The coefficients and the coefficients each sum to , so one addition gives a clean equation with unit coefficients.

  3. 3
    Subtracting:

    Why: The same near-symmetry makes the difference collapse to .

  4. 4
    and give , , so

    Why: Adding and halving gives ; subtracting and halving gives .

Shortcut

Whenever the two coefficient pairs are each other's reverse, add for and subtract for — no elimination arithmetic is needed.

Common mistakes

Option B

Found and reported the sum instead of the product.

Option C

Solved correctly but lost a sign, taking , or , .

Option D

Combined the sign slip with reporting , giving .

Skills used

8Algebra • Equations • Linear Equations
ModerateIdeal time: about 1.5 min

If and , then what is equal to ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option A

Approach

Eliminate between the two equations, then clear denominators.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    From :

    Why: Isolating the term the two equations share is what lets them be joined.

  2. 2
    Taking reciprocals,

    Why: The second equation contains , not , so invert. This needs , which holds because is defined and non-zero.

  3. 3
    Substituting into :

    Why: With known in terms of and , the second equation becomes a relation between , , and alone — the four letters the question asks about.

  4. 4

    Why: Cross-multiplying and collecting puts the required numerator against the required denominator .

  5. 5

    Why: The numerator is literally the denominator.

Common mistakes

Option B

Added the two right-hand sides, treating the answer as .

Option C

Assumed and cancel, reading the relation as without noticing that this is what makes the numerator equal , not .

Option D

Kept instead of , flipping the sign when cross-multiplying .

Skills used

9Algebra • Expressions • Simplification
ModerateIdeal time: about 1.5 min

If , then what is the value of ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option C

Approach

Recognise both expressions as and , and connect them with the difference-of-cubes identity.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1

    Why: Splitting the fraction term by term shows the given is the classic 'number minus its reciprocal'.

  2. 2

    Why: The same split applied to the target: it is the cube version of the given.

  3. 3

    Why: Squaring produces , since the cross term is .

  4. 4

    Why: Difference of cubes with : the middle term of the quadratic factor is .

Shortcut

Use with : .

Common mistakes

Option A

Cubed the given value and stopped, forgetting the extra .

Option B

Made the same omission and also flipped the sign, computing .

Option D

Got the magnitude right but evaluated , reversing the order of subtraction.

Skills used

10Algebra • Expressions • Simplification
ModerateIdeal time: about 1.5 min

If , then what is equal to ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option D

Approach

Use to turn each bracket into a single variable, then apply the three-cubes identity.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    , so ; likewise and

    Why: The condition replaces each pair sum by minus the remaining variable, which is what makes every bracket collapse.

  2. 2

    Why: Cubing gives , a common factor of all three terms.

  3. 3
    Since ,

    Why: The identity has a vanishing first factor when the three add to zero.

  4. 4

    Why: Combine the two previous lines.

Shortcut

Each bracket is times a variable, so the whole expression is times , which is when the sum is zero.

Common mistakes

Option A

Noticed the three brackets add to and concluded the answer must be itself.

Option B

Applied correctly but never simplified the brackets, then mis-transcribed as .

Option C

Dropped the minus from , treating it as .

Skills used

11Algebra • Polynomial • Factor and Remainder Theorem
Very easyIdeal time: about 40 s

If is a factor of , then what is the value of ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option A

Approach

Apply the factor theorem: is a factor exactly when the polynomial vanishes at .

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    Let . Then is a factor .

    Why: The factor theorem converts a divisibility statement into a single evaluation, so no long division is needed.

  2. 2

    Why: Evaluate term by term, watching that is negative while is positive.

  3. 3

    Why: The first two terms cancel, leaving a one-line equation for .

Common mistakes

Option B

No route reaches from this evaluation.

Option C

No route reaches from this evaluation.

Option D

No route reaches from this evaluation.

Skills used

12Arithmetic • Number System • Perfect Squares
EasyIdeal time: about 45 s

The smallest integer with digits which is a perfect square is

Options
Show answer & solution

Option B

Approach

The smallest four-digit number is , so find the least integer whose square is at least .

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    A four-digit integer is one with , so the target is the least perfect square .

    Why: Fixes exactly what has to be minimised; 'smallest four-digit' is a lower bound, not the number itself.

  2. 2
    and

    Why: Squares increase with the base, so the first base whose square clears gives the first four-digit square; is short and clears it.

  3. 3
    has odd indices, so it is not a perfect square; is.

    Why: Prime factorisation settles both candidates outright: a perfect square has every prime index even.

  4. 4
    Every integer strictly between and lies between two consecutive squares, so none is a square. The answer is .

    Why: This is what makes the smallest rather than merely a four-digit square.

Shortcut

, so round up to and square.

Common mistakes

Option A

Gave the smallest four-digit number without checking that it is a perfect square.

Option C

Rounded up past to , giving the second four-digit square instead of the first.

Option D

Concluded that no listed value works, having failed to recognise .

Skills used

13Algebra • Polynomial • Zeros and Coefficients
Very easyIdeal time: about 35 s

Which one of the following is a zero of the polynomial ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option B

Approach

A zero of a polynomial is a value at which it evaluates to ; evaluate the candidates the question offers as values, not as options to be matched.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    Let . A zero is any with .

    Why: This is the definition the factor theorem rests on, and it makes the search a matter of evaluation.

  2. 2
    The constant term is and the coefficients sum to , so .

    Why: For any polynomial, is just the sum of the coefficients, so a coefficient sum of zero exhibits as a root immediately.

  3. 3
    is a zero, and correspondingly

    Why: Dividing out confirms the root and shows the remaining quadratic has discriminant , so is the only real zero.

Shortcut

The coefficients add to zero, so is a root — no substitution needed.

Common mistakes

Option A

Read the constant term as the value at and treated a non-zero constant as no obstacle.

Option C

No route reaches as a zero.

Option D

Evaluated as instead of , making .

Skills used

14Arithmetic • Number System • LCM and HCF
ModerateIdeal time: about 1.5 min

There are two numbers which are greater than and their LCM and HCF are and respectively. What is the sum of these numbers ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option A

Approach

Write both numbers as the HCF times coprime factors, then use HCF LCM product to pin those factors down.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    , so the numbers are and with .

    Why: Pulling the HCF out of both numbers leaves a coprime pair, since any shared factor of and would enlarge the HCF.

  2. 2
    , so

    Why: The product identity turns the two given quantities into a single equation for .

  3. 3
    , so the coprime factorisations of are and .

    Why: Both and are prime, so these are the only two ways to split , and both splits happen to be coprime.

  4. 4
    would give the number , which is not greater than ; so and the numbers are and .

    Why: The condition 'both greater than ' is what eliminates the trivial split and makes the answer unique.

  5. 5

    Why: The sum asked for.

Common mistakes

Option B

Reached the right pair but mis-added .

Option C

No route reaches from this pair.

Option D

No route reaches from this pair.

Skills used

15Algebra • Quadratic Equations • Roots
EasyIdeal time: about 55 s

If and are the roots of the equation , then what is the value of the expression ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option C

Approach

Expand the product and replace the sum and the product of the roots by Vieta's expressions.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1

    Why: Expanding first means only symmetric functions of the roots are needed, so the roots never have to be found.

  2. 2
    For : and

    Why: Vieta's relations, with the minus sign sitting on the sum, not on the product.

  3. 3

    Why: Putting everything over collects the three terms into one fraction.

Shortcut

is divided by the leading coefficient, and .

Common mistakes

Option A

Dropped the minus sign on , giving .

Option B

Put the minus on the wrong term, subtracting instead of .

Option D

Flipped the signs of both and , subtracting the product term instead of adding it.

Skills used

16Algebra • Polynomial • Factor and Remainder Theorem
EasyIdeal time: about 50 s

The remainder when is divided by is . What is the value of ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option D

Approach

Apply the remainder theorem: the remainder on division by is the value at .

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    Let . Dividing by leaves the remainder .

    Why: The remainder theorem replaces a long division by a single evaluation.

  2. 2

    Why: Only the term keeps its sign, since while .

  3. 3

    Why: Set the evaluated remainder equal to the given remainder.

Common mistakes

Option A

Solved as , or equivalently flipped the sign of after reaching .

Option B

Set the remainder to zero instead of , solving .

Option C

Copied the given remainder across as the value of .

Skills used

17Algebra • Polynomial
EasyIdeal time: about 1 min

If and are polynomials of degree and respectively, then the degree of (if it is non-zero) is

Options
Show answer & solution

Option C

Less than or equal to

Approach

Add the two polynomials term by term: no term of degree above can appear, and the top term may cancel.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    Every term of has degree at most and every term of at most , so every term of has degree at most .

    Why: Addition never creates a power that was not already present in one of the summands, so the degree cannot rise.

  2. 2
    When the leading terms do not cancel, ; e.g. , gives degree .

    Why: Equality is attained, so the bound cannot be tightened to a strict inequality.

  3. 3
    When they do cancel the degree drops: , gives , of degree .

    Why: This single example kills 'greater than ' and 'equal to ' alike, since here while the degree is .

  4. 4
    Hence , and nothing stronger holds in general.

    Why: The bound is exactly the one that is always true and sometimes tight.

Common mistakes

Option A

Overlooked that a cancellation can push the degree below , as does when .

Option B

Confused adding polynomials with multiplying them, where the degrees add.

Option D

Took the degree of a sum to be governed by the smaller degree rather than the larger.

Skills used

18Algebra • Surds • Simplification
EasyIdeal time: about 1 min

What is the value of ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option A

Approach

Put the two fractions over the common denominator , which is rational.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    Write and ; the expression is .

    Why: Naming the two conjugates turns a messy surd expression into one difference of squares over one product.

  2. 2

    Why: A conjugate pair multiplies to a difference of squares, which clears both surds at once.

  3. 3

    Why: Factorising as a difference of squares avoids expanding and separately.

  4. 4

    Why: Divide; the result is negative because , so .

Shortcut

and with , so the answer is straight away.

Common mistakes

Option B

Computed , reversing the order in which the question writes the two fractions.

Option C

Halved twice, or divided by instead of , and also lost the sign.

Option D

Divided by rather than by , giving .

Skills used

19Algebra • Expressions • Simplification
ModerateIdeal time: about 1.5 min

What is the value of where ?

Options
Show answer & solution

Option C

Approach

Multiply each fraction above and below by the power of that clears its negative indices; all three then share the denominator .

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    First term: multiply numerator and denominator by , giving

    Why: The indices in the denominator are all differences measured from , so multiplying by restores them to , and .

  2. 2
    Second term, multiplied above and below by :

    Why: Same move with as the reference index, and the denominator is the same three-term sum.

  3. 3
    Third term, multiplied above and below by :

    Why: And again with , which is why the three fractions can now simply be added.

  4. 4
    Sum

    Why: The numerators add to the common denominator, which is non-zero for .

Shortcut

Each term is in disguise, so the three fractions are shares of one whole.

Common mistakes

Option A

Applied the same trick but inverted the indices, producing .

Option B

Expected the terms to cancel in pairs because the index differences come in opposite signs.

Option D

Took each denominator to be — true only when — and added three ones.

Skills used

20Algebra • Quadratic Equations • Word Problems
EasyIdeal time: about 45 s

The sum of a number and its square is . Then the number is

Options
Show answer & solution

Option A

or

Approach

Name the number, translate the sentence into a quadratic, and solve it by factorising.

Step-by-step solution

  1. 1
    Let the number be . Then .

    Why: 'A number and its square' are and ; 'the sum is ' is the one relation the problem states.

  2. 2

    Why: Bring everything to one side so the zero-product property can be used.

  3. 3

    Why: Split the middle term using the pair and , which multiply to and add to .

  4. 4
    or

    Why: A product is zero only when a factor is; both roots are admissible because the problem says 'a number', not 'a positive number'.

Common mistakes

Option B

Looked for two numbers multiplying to rather than solving the quadratic, landing on the factor pair of the middle-term split.

Option C

Solved correctly but discarded , keeping only the root that is not itself a factor of .

Option D

Factorised as , flipping the signs of both roots.

Skills used